| Best regards | | | | heard from |
| Carole Martin | | | | Jim. |
| Follow-Up After The Job Interview - To Send or Not | | | | That afternoon, Catherine closed her door. She was |
| to Send a Letter | | | | going tocatch up and then work on her decision |
| Your letter could be the tiebreaker between you and | | | | regarding thebusiness analyst position. The first thing |
| two, oreven three, candidates so put some thought | | | | she did was openher mail. Among the mail was a |
| and effortbehind what you say. Even if it doesn't get | | | | letter from Steven. Itcaught her attention because of |
| you the job,what do you have to lose – the cost | | | | the depth she could see hehad gone to. She stopped |
| of a postagestamp? Hedge your bet it could land you | | | | and read the letter. |
| a job. | | | | Dear Catherine: |
| To send or not to send - will it really make a | | | | Choosing the right candidate is not an easy task and I |
| difference? | | | | wantyou to know I have been in your shoes before. |
| Catherine was looking for a business analyst for a | | | | Based on our interview, I have done some thinking |
| positionthat had been vacant for four weeks. She was | | | | about theposition and how I could bring added value to |
| eager to hire,but wanted the right person in the job. | | | | yourorganization and support some of the problems |
| She had narrowedthe field to three candidates, Jim, | | | | you discussedin during the interview... |
| Kelly, and Steven. | | | | What followed was a spreadsheet with the issues |
| She had promised to call them by Friday, and on | | | | Steven hadpicked up during the interview. He not only |
| Wednesdayafternoon she was still vacillating. Each | | | | identified someof the problems, but also showed how |
| had a strengthshe was looking for, but each also had | | | | he could be thesolution based on past experience. As |
| some issues that hadmade her stand back and be | | | | Catherine read theletter she became intrigued, and |
| objective. Jim had held severaljobs in the last few | | | | liked what she read. Thisguy not only heard the issues, |
| years. Would he stick around for thetough times | | | | but he had given them somethought and did some |
| ahead? Kelly was ambitious, but didn't have thedepth | | | | analysis - looked beyond what wassaid. This was a |
| of experience interacting with difficult people. And, | | | | trait she was seeking. She wanted to talkto him again. |
| Steven was the quiet type who didn't reveal himself | | | | The follow-up, thank you, letter is more than a nice |
| enoughfor her to get to know what he could offer, | | | | "thankyou for the interview." It is one more chance for |
| particularlyinterfacing with other departments and | | | | you tosell yourself, and to tell them what you can do |
| working underpressure. | | | | for them. |
| When Catherine opened her email that morning she | | | | Don't assume the interviewer remembers everything |
| had 42emails. She had glanced over them and thought | | | | you said. |
| she had seen | | | | When three candidates are interviewed and |
| Jim's name among the many, but hadn't taken the time | | | | compared, some ofthe highlights you hoped would be |
| toread it. She had 17 voice mails and there was a one | | | | considered, got lost orforgotten. Remind them of what |
| from | | | | you can do for them –not what they can do for |
| Kelly, but she only listened long enough to hear that | | | | you. |
| shewas thanking her for the interview. She hadn't | | | | |